Store staff
Turnover measured in months

The problem here is not a regulator. It is scale, churn, and access nobody can withdraw centrally. Store teams, regional contractors and constant churn, governed from one place.
Hundreds of sites, thousands of joiners
Turnover measured in months
Covering 10 or 20 stores, sometimes more
Shift peaks, seasonal surges, high volume
Refrigeration, cleaning, security, per region
Loss prevention · insurance · GDPR

Thousands of joiners and leavers a month across hundreds of sites. The cost is not a fine. It is the hours, the shared codes, and the lock changes you pay for when a contract ends.
Retail & Distribution
40 refrigeration technicians hold access to 220 stores across 3 regions. The new supplier starts Monday.
The contract ends. The contracting company is closed in the platform. 40 people, and not 1 company.
Access stops in all 220 stores that evening, whatever access system each of them runs.
The incoming supplier loads its own technicians and their certificates over the weekend, through its own login.
The new technicians badge into the stores on their route, with access limited to the stores on their route.
Yes. Access is held against the contracting company as well as the individual. Ending a contract closes 1 record instead of several hundred, across every store and whatever access system each store runs.
It removes the reason for them. Shared codes exist because issuing an individual credential is slow. When issuance is automatic against the identity record, each person can hold their own.
By store format, with nothing typed in by hand. A new site inherits the access definition for its store format. Nobody has to drive out and configure it locally.
You judge something that runs on your own site. Your access systems and readers stay where they are. If it earns its place, we extend it site by site.
One siteOne populationYour readers stay