Access lives in the systems, and not in a policy
Every site runs its own access control system, with its own groups, its own administrators and its own logic. Nobody owns the rule across all of them.

Nothing is replaced. The decision, the approval and the record move one layer up.
Identity comes in from the systems that already own it. Decisions go down into the access systems you already run. Evidence comes back up, written as it happens.
Each one stands alone. Together they close the loop between the reason someone is on site and the door that opens for them.
1 record per person, above every system
Find out more
No certificate, no badge-in
Find out more
One identity, verified at every reader
Find out more
One terminal, doing the work of a reception desk
Find out more
One credential, and who holds the keys to it
Find out more
Evidence, not intentions
Find out more
4 patterns we find in almost every organisation before we start.
Every site runs its own access control system, with its own groups, its own administrators and its own logic. Nobody owns the rule across all of them.
Joiners, movers and leavers are re-keyed by hand. Rights outlive the reason they were given, and it usually surfaces during an audit.
Certificates, inductions, permits and insurance sit in inboxes and spreadsheets, verified at the gate, by a person, under time pressure.
Proving who approved which access, and why, means exporting from several systems and piecing the story together.
None of them are going away, and none of them are solved by another access control system.
NIS2, ISPS, food defence, DORA, GDPR. Access rights are no longer an operational detail. They are evidence you have to produce.
Contractors, temps, service partners, drivers and visitors. The population you control least is the population you must control best.
Mobile and biometrics arrive while the existing card base still has to keep working. Both have to live in one lifecycle.
Identity governance, single sign-on, data residency, no unmanaged servers. IT now has a veto on physical security projects.
Every platform in this category answers them differently. These are our answers, and each one can be checked.
| Ask | Axxession |
|---|---|
| Does it govern the access control systems already installed at our sites? | 7 working integrations today, including European systems such as Nedap AEOS, primion GET and Equans I-CARDS. Working integrations, not certified ones. |
| Who do we contract with, and under which law? | No parent or shareholder outside the EU; your contract is with a Belgian entity, governed by Belgian law. |
| Where is the service hosted? | Hosted in European Union data centres. |
| Who holds the keys to our credentials? | You do. The keys stay in a secure module under your control, or escrowed to you. |
| Are staff, contractors and visitors on one record? | Yes. One identity record per person, with the credential and the self-service terminal on the same platform. |
| Is the supplier certified? | ISO 27001 certification in progress. |
No. It is the governance layer above access control systems. Readers, controllers and panels stay exactly as they are. What changes is where the decision is made, who approves it, when it ends, and where the record lives.
Yes. Each module stands alone. Most organisations start with the problem that is hurting, contractors, or visitors, or the audit finding with a date on it. The rest follows once that 1 has earned its place.
Through one standard connection using SCIM 2.0 or file exchange, set up the way your IT team already connects any other business application. There is no development project and no second copy of your people data.
You judge something that runs on your own site. Your access systems and readers stay where they are. If it earns its place, we extend it site by site.
One siteOne populationYour readers stay